Myndgard

Blog · · 5 min read

Why naming feelings helps: what the research on affect labelling shows

What research on affect labelling and emotional granularity shows, its limits, and simple exercises students can try.

By Myndgard Limited

Banner reading: Why naming feelings helps

Exam season is a good time to notice how often students describe their state with one word: "stressed". Sometimes that is accurate. Often it is standing in for something more specific, such as dread about one paper, guilt about time lost, or frustration with a group project. A body of research suggests that finding the more precise word is not just a nicety. It may change how the feeling behaves.

This post covers two related ideas, affect labelling and emotional granularity, what the evidence shows for each, and where it runs out.

Affect labelling: putting feelings into words

In a widely cited 2007 brain-imaging study, Lieberman and colleagues showed people negative emotional images and asked them to do different things with them. When participants chose a word to describe the emotion in a picture, activity in the amygdala and other limbic regions was lower than with other ways of processing the same images. Labelling also increased activity in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and the more that region was active, the less the amygdala was. The authors proposed this as one pathway by which naming a feeling can reduce emotional reactivity.

Later work looked beyond brain scans. In four studies published in 2011, Lieberman and colleagues found that people reported less distress when labelling negative images than when simply watching them, with effects similar to deliberate strategies such as reappraisal and distraction. One finding stands out: participants did not expect labelling to help, and even after experiencing lower distress they predicted it would make them feel worse in future. The authors describe affect labelling as an "incidental" form of emotion regulation, something that works without feeling like a strategy. Labelling also dampened pleasure when people looked at positive images, which suggests it softens emotional intensity in general rather than only easing negative feelings.

A 2012 study by Kircanski, Lieberman and Craske took the idea into a clinical-style setting. People with a fear of spiders were exposed to a live spider while either labelling their feelings, reappraising, distracting themselves or simply being exposed. A week later, the labelling group showed lower physiological arousal (skin conductance) when facing a different spider, and people who used more anxiety and fear words during exposure showed larger reductions. However, the labelling group did not report feeling less afraid than the other groups.

Emotional granularity: how precisely you name it

A second line of research asks not whether people name their feelings but how finely they distinguish them. Researchers call this emotion differentiation or emotional granularity. In a 2015 review, Kashdan, Barrett and McKnight summarised findings that people who describe negative emotions with more granularity are, under intense distress, less likely to turn to binge drinking, aggression or self-injury, and tend to experience less severe anxiety and depression.

Some of that evidence comes from students. In a four-year daily diary study of 502 US college students (Brown and colleagues, 2021), those with greater negative emotion differentiation were less likely to use disengagement strategies such as substance use when stressed. Differentiation was not related to engagement strategies such as problem-solving or seeking support.

A 2021 meta-analysis by Seah and Coifman pooled 17 studies and found a small association between negative emotion differentiation and fewer maladaptive behaviours (r = −0.15), which shrank to r = −0.09 after accounting for how much negative emotion people felt overall.

Can granularity be learned?

Early evidence suggests it can be improved. In a 2021 study with 120 participants, Vedernikova, Kuppens and Erbas found that a brief emotion-knowledge intervention increased negative emotion differentiation compared with a control group. A mindfulness study by Van der Gucht and colleagues (2018) also found improvements, though the change in negative emotion differentiation was no longer significant once overall negative mood was taken into account.

The limits of the evidence

It is worth being plain about what this research does not show.

  • Most affect-labelling studies are lab experiments with pictures or brief exposures. They show short-term changes in arousal or self-report, not lasting improvements in mental health.
  • Physiology and feelings do not always move together. In the spider study, labelling changed arousal but not reported fear.
  • Granularity findings are mostly correlational. People who differentiate their emotions well may differ in other ways too. The associations in the meta-analysis are small.
  • The mechanism is still debated. A systematic review of 31 studies, posted as a preprint by Whiting and Nook this week and not yet peer reviewed, found the evidence linking emotion differentiation to emotion regulation "highly inconsistent", partly because studies measure differentiation in different ways.

None of this makes naming feelings a treatment. It is a skill with a sensible rationale and promising, if modest, evidence.

Exercises students can try

These are low-effort ways to practise. They are not a substitute for support if things feel unmanageable.

  1. Two-word check-in. A few times a day, stop and name what you feel in two specific words, such as "restless and irritated" rather than "bad". If the first word is "stressed", ask what kind of stressed.
  2. Widen your vocabulary. Keep a short list of feeling words on your phone and add to it when you notice a new shade (for example disappointed, uneasy, overwhelmed, flat, resentful, relieved).
  3. Name it, then notice it. When a strong feeling arrives, say or write "I'm noticing I feel…" and finish the sentence. The aim is to describe rather than to judge or fix.
  4. Separate the strands. After a difficult moment, write down each emotion present and roughly how strong it was out of ten. Mixed feelings are normal, and seeing them separately can make them easier to respond to.
  5. Link the feeling to a need. Once named, ask what the feeling might be pointing to. Anxiety before an exam might point to preparation; loneliness might point to contact.

In practice

For counselling services and wellbeing teams, emotional vocabulary is a reasonable thing to build into psychoeducation, workshops and waiting-list materials, provided it is framed honestly as a skill rather than a cure. Encouraging students to use precise words in check-ins can also make conversations with counsellors richer when sessions begin.

Sources